Expert Analyst: Industry Intelligence & Strategic Futures Division
This report provides an exhaustive analysis of DeepSeek, the Chinese artificial intelligence company that has emerged as one of the most significant and polarizing forces in the global technology landscape. It deconstructs the company's foundational technologies, evaluates its performance against established industry leaders, and conducts a rigorous assessment of the profound security, privacy, and ethical risks associated with its products. The analysis is intended for technology leaders, investors, developers, and policymakers seeking a nuanced and data-driven understanding of the DeepSeek phenomenon and its far-reaching implications for the future of AI.
There is a podcast episode for this deepseek paradox. Feel free to watch,
Section 1: Introduction: The "Sputnik Moment" of Artificial Intelligence
In the annals of technological history, certain events serve as inflection points, fundamentally altering the trajectory of an industry overnight. For artificial intelligence, such a moment arrived in January 2025 with the explosive emergence of DeepSeek, a relatively unknown Chinese startup. The company's announcements did not just introduce a new competitor; they triggered a seismic shock that reverberated from the trading floors of Wall Street to the research labs of Silicon Valley, forcing a global reckoning with the established paradigms of AI development. This event, and the company at its center, represents a profound paradox: DeepSeek is simultaneously a beacon of algorithmic efficiency and open-source collaboration, and a case study in acute security, privacy, and ethical liabilities.
1.1 The Shot Heard 'Round the Valley
The market's reaction to DeepSeek's debut was swift and brutal, signaling a deep-seated anxiety about a potential shift in the global AI power balance. In the days following the release of its highly capable and cost-efficient R1 model, the U.S. stock market lost more than $1 trillion in market capitalization. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite index fell by 3%, while Nvidia, the chipmaker at the heart of the AI boom, suffered the worst single-day loss of market value in history, erasing $589 billion.1 This was not merely a reaction to a new product; it was a repricing of the entire AI ecosystem's foundational assumptions.
While investors panicked, users and developers flocked to the new platform. The free DeepSeek chatbot, powered by its R1 model, surged to the number one position on Apple's iPhone App Store in the United States, displacing established giants like ChatGPT.1 This rapid adoption demonstrated a massive appetite for powerful AI tools, especially those that promised superior performance at a lower cost.
The phenomenon was quickly labeled "AI's Sputnik moment" by prominent venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, a term that captured the geopolitical and technological shock of the event.1 Just as the Soviet Union's 1957 satellite launch shattered American assumptions of technological supremacy and ignited the space race, DeepSeek's emergence from China challenged the West's perceived dominance in the field of generative AI. It raised uncomfortable questions about the efficacy of U.S. export controls on advanced semiconductors and signaled that a formidable new competitor had arrived on the world stage.4
1.2 The Central Paradox
The intense buzz surrounding DeepSeek stems from a central, unresolved tension. On one hand, the company has earned legitimate praise from the global scientific community for its remarkable innovations.1 It demonstrated an ability to build state-of-the-art AI models that could rival or even outperform those from Western tech giants, but at a fraction of the training cost and with less powerful hardware.9 This achievement was celebrated as a victory for clever engineering and algorithmic ingenuity over brute-force capital expenditure.
On the other hand, this technological prowess is shadowed by a litany of severe and well-documented risks. Cybersecurity firms, government agencies, and privacy advocates have issued stark warnings about the platform's glaring security vulnerabilities, aggressive data collection practices, and troubling connections to the Chinese state.6 DeepSeek's story is therefore not a simple tale of an underdog innovator. It is a complex narrative of a company that embodies both the brightest promise and the darkest perils of the modern AI era.
The market's violent reaction in January 2025 was, at its core, an attack on the prevailing "capital-intensive" paradigm of AI development that had defined the industry for years. The dominant narrative, championed by companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, was that building frontier AI models required near-limitless capital to acquire massive fleets of GPUs and construct sprawling data centers.4 This created an immense barrier to entry, justifying enormous valuations and successive funding rounds that consolidated power in the hands of a few tech behemoths.
DeepSeek shattered this narrative. By claiming to achieve comparable or superior results with its R1 model for less than $6 million—compared to an estimated cost of over $100 million for OpenAI's GPT-4—the company directly challenged the strategic "moat" of capital.1 If a small, independent lab could achieve this, then the massive spending of incumbents began to look less like a strategic necessity and more like a sign of inefficiency.1 The subsequent plunge in tech stocks, particularly chipmakers like Nvidia, was a direct reflection of this threatened paradigm. The market was forced to confront a new reality: algorithmic efficiency could be a more powerful, and cheaper, lever for progress than raw compute power, a possibility it had previously discounted.19 DeepSeek proved that innovation, not just investment, could define the cutting edge of AI.
Section 2: The Architect of Disruption: Founder, Funding, and Philosophy
To understand DeepSeek's disruptive impact, one must first understand the unique corporate structure and ideology that drive its strategy. The company is the product of its founder's unconventional vision, a self-sustaining financial model that grants it immense freedom, and a core philosophy that prioritizes foundational research over short-term commercial gain. This combination of factors has created a "perfect storm" for innovation, allowing DeepSeek to challenge the norms of the AI industry from a position of strategic independence.
2.1 The Quant King Turned AGI Seeker: Liang Wenfeng
At the heart of DeepSeek is its enigmatic founder, Liang Wenfeng.21 Far from the typical Silicon Valley entrepreneur, Liang hails from the world of high-stakes quantitative finance.3 A mathematics prodigy, he earned a Master's degree in Information and Communication Engineering from the prestigious Zhejiang University before co-founding the quantitative hedge fund High-Flyer in 2015.3 Under his leadership, High-Flyer grew to manage assets of approximately $8 billion by pioneering the use of artificial intelligence in its trading strategies to predict market trends.3
This background in quantitative finance is critical to understanding DeepSeek's DNA. It instilled a culture of ruthless efficiency and data-driven optimization, where marginal gains in performance can translate into significant advantages. Liang's pivot toward general AI began in 2021, when he started purchasing thousands of Nvidia's high-end graphics processors—a move made foresightedly before the U.S. government imposed stringent export controls on such chips to China.3 At the time, business partners viewed it as a "quirky hobby" and did not take him seriously, with one recalling him as a "very nerdy guy with a terrible hairstyle" who was unable to articulate a clear vision beyond a belief that his 10,000-chip cluster would be a "game changer".3 In 2023, he formally launched DeepSeek, dedicating himself to the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).3
2.2 A Self-Sustaining Engine: The High-Flyer Funding Model
DeepSeek's financial structure is as unconventional as its founder. The company is entirely funded by High-Flyer, with no external venture capital, institutional, or angel investors.23 The profits generated by the hedge fund's AI-driven trading algorithms provide the capital for DeepSeek's ambitious and costly research and development efforts.
This unique model grants DeepSeek a level of financial independence that is virtually unheard of among AI startups. It is insulated from the relentless pressure of VC funding cycles, which often demand a clear and rapid path to commercialization and profitability. This freedom allows the company to adopt a "long-termism" approach, focusing its resources on the foundational, high-risk research required to achieve its ultimate goal of AGI, rather than being forced to chase immediate revenue through application development.24 The combination of patient capital from the hedge fund and an efficiency-obsessed culture from Liang's quant trading background enables DeepSeek to undertake the kind of fundamental architectural research—such as developing its novel attention mechanisms and expert models—that other companies might deem too time-consuming or commercially unviable. This makes DeepSeek not just a technological competitor, but an ideological one, demonstrating an alternative path to state-of-the-art AI development that challenges the "blitzscaling" model of Silicon Valley.
2.3 The AGI Mission and Open-Source Doctrine
DeepSeek's mission is unabashedly ambitious: the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence.3 Liang Wenfeng has stated his belief that AGI will be achieved within our lifetime and that large language models represent the most promising path toward this goal.22 This singular focus on AGI informs every aspect of the company's strategy, from its research priorities to its organizational structure.
Central to this strategy is a fervent commitment to open-source principles. DeepSeek consistently releases its model weights and detailed technical reports to the public, a move that Liang describes not as a business strategy but as a "cultural act".24 He argues that in a field of disruptive technology, "a closed-source moat is temporary" and that true competitive advantage lies in a team's accumulated knowledge and innovative culture.24 This open approach serves two strategic purposes: it acts as a powerful magnet for attracting top-tier engineering talent, and it fosters a collaborative global ecosystem that can accelerate progress.29 This stands in stark contrast to the increasingly proprietary approach of its primary rival, OpenAI.
This philosophy extends to the company's talent strategy. DeepSeek prioritizes passion and raw curiosity over lengthy work experience, leading to a team composed of many young researchers hired directly from top Chinese universities.21 Unconventionally, the company also recruits graduates from the humanities, believing that diverse perspectives are essential for building nuanced and capable AI.28 This talent is organized within a flat, bottom-up structure that eschews hierarchy in favor of innovation and collaboration.23
Section 3: The Technological "Magic": Deconstructing DeepSeek's Innovation Stack
DeepSeek's ability to achieve state-of-the-art performance at a fraction of the cost of its competitors is not the result of a single breakthrough, but rather a suite of integrated technological innovations. The company has engineered a holistic, system-level architecture optimized for efficiency at every stage of the AI pipeline—from training and data processing to inference and deployment. This full-stack attack on the traditional cost structure of AI is the "magic" behind its disruption. By innovating around resource constraints, DeepSeek has demonstrated that superior algorithms and clever engineering can be more impactful than sheer computational power.
3.1 The "Less is More" Paradigm: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)
At the core of DeepSeek's architecture is the Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model, a design that enables massive scale without a corresponding explosion in computational cost.1 In a traditional "dense" AI model, the entire network of parameters is activated to process every single piece of information (or "token"). This is analogous to having a single, highly knowledgeable generalist who must apply their entire breadth of knowledge to every question, no matter how simple.
MoE models, in contrast, function like a team of specialized consultants. The architecture consists of numerous smaller "expert" neural networks, each trained to handle specific types of information or tasks. A lightweight "gating network," or router, analyzes an incoming token and intelligently directs it to only the most relevant subset of experts.33
DeepSeek's implementation, known as DeepSeekMoE, takes this concept to an extreme scale. Its flagship models, DeepSeek-V2 and DeepSeek-V3, contain a colossal number of total parameters—236 billion and 671 billion, respectively. However, for any given token, they only activate a small fraction of these parameters—21 billion for V2 and 37 billion for V3.26 This allows the models to possess a vast repository of knowledge (encoded in the total parameters) while maintaining extremely low and efficient computational costs during inference (determined by the active parameters). The company has further refined this approach by incorporating both fine-grained experts for highly specialized knowledge and "shared experts" that handle common, general knowledge, improving both specialization and overall efficiency.32 This attack on compute cost is the first pillar of DeepSeek's efficiency strategy.
3.2 Solving the Memory Bottleneck: Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA)
While MoE addresses the cost of computation, another critical bottleneck in large language models is memory, specifically the Key-Value (KV) cache. In standard transformer architectures, the model must store key and value vectors for every token in the input sequence to calculate attention scores. As the context window (the amount of text the model can consider at once) grows, the size of this KV cache increases linearly, consuming enormous amounts of high-speed GPU memory and limiting performance.39
DeepSeek's solution to this problem is an innovative mechanism called Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA).41 Instead of storing the full, high-dimensional key and value vectors, MLA uses a technique known as low-rank factorization to compress them into a much smaller, lower-dimensional "latent vector"—effectively a compressed summary of the necessary information.31
The impact of this innovation is profound. MLA achieves a staggering 93.3% reduction in the size of the KV cache.36 This dramatic memory saving allows DeepSeek's models to support massive context windows of up to 128,000 tokens (equivalent to a large book) while using significantly less GPU memory. This, in turn, boosts the maximum generation throughput by over five times, making inference not only more memory-efficient but also much faster.31 MLA represents a direct attack on the memory cost of AI, the second pillar of DeepSeek's efficiency stack.
3.3 Teaching a Machine to Think: The Reinforcement Learning (RL) Pipeline
The third pillar of DeepSeek's strategy is an attack on the cost of data. Traditionally, after pre-training on a vast corpus of text, models undergo Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), where they are trained on massive, expensive, human-curated datasets of high-quality examples to align them with desired behaviors. DeepSeek has pioneered a novel training recipe for its R-series reasoning models that minimizes this reliance on costly supervised data by prioritizing large-scale Reinforcement Learning (RL).1
The company's DeepSeek-R1-Zero model was a landmark experiment in this domain. Starting with a pre-trained base model, it was trained almost exclusively using RL, without a preliminary SFT step. The model learned complex reasoning capabilities, such as generating step-by-step "chain-of-thought" processes, autonomously through a process of trial and error, guided by reward signals based on the accuracy of its final answers.35 This was a major research milestone, proving that advanced reasoning could emerge without explicit human supervision.
However, the R1-Zero model suffered from issues like poor readability and language mixing. To create the production-ready DeepSeek-R1, the company developed a more refined multi-stage pipeline. This process begins with a "cold-start" SFT phase, using only a small, high-quality dataset to fix the coherence issues of R1-Zero. This is followed by the powerful, large-scale RL process, which uses an advanced algorithm called Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to hone the model's reasoning abilities on math, code, and logic problems.21 This RL-centric approach significantly reduces the need for expensive human-labeled data, attacking a third major cost center in AI development.
3.4 The Power of Distillation: Creating Smaller, Potent Models
The final component of DeepSeek's strategy addresses the cost of deployment. While its flagship models are massive, the company uses a technique called knowledge distillation to package their power into smaller, more accessible forms.49
Knowledge distillation involves using a large, powerful "teacher" model (like DeepSeek-R1) to generate a vast synthetic dataset of high-quality examples, complete with detailed reasoning steps. This dataset is then used to train a much smaller "student" model.35 The student model learns to mimic the teacher's sophisticated reasoning patterns, effectively inheriting its capabilities at a fraction of the size and computational cost.
DeepSeek has successfully applied this technique by using R1 to generate 800,000 high-quality reasoning samples to fine-tune a suite of popular open-source models, including Meta's Llama and Alibaba's Qwen.35 The resulting "distilled" models, ranging in size from 1.5 billion to 70 billion parameters, offer remarkable reasoning performance that far exceeds that of their original base models.35 This strategy democratizes access to state-of-the-art reasoning capabilities, allowing developers to deploy highly potent models without requiring massive GPU infrastructure, thereby attacking the final cost barrier: deployment.
Section 4: The Arsenal: A Comprehensive Review of DeepSeek's Model Lineage
DeepSeek's rapid and iterative development cycle has produced a diverse and sometimes confusing array of models. Understanding the lineage, from early coding models to the latest reasoning powerhouses, is essential for appreciating the company's technological trajectory and for selecting the appropriate tool for a given task. The models can be broadly categorized into foundational code and language models, the highly efficient V-series, and the specialized R-series for reasoning.
4.1 The Foundation: Code and General LLMs (2023-2024)
DeepSeek's initial foray into large models focused heavily on the domain of programming, a strategic choice that allowed them to test and benchmark capabilities in a verifiable, logical environment.
DeepSeek Coder & Coder V2: Released in late 2023, the original DeepSeek Coder was a series of models trained from scratch on a massive 2 trillion token dataset, of which 87% was source code and 13% was natural language.50 With sizes ranging from 1 billion to 33 billion parameters, these models already demonstrated state-of-the-art performance among open-source code models. The release of
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 in mid-2024 marked a significant leap forward. It introduced the Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to the coder family, dramatically expanded its supported programming languages from 86 to 338, and extended its context length to 128K tokens. On coding and math benchmarks, Coder-V2 achieved performance comparable to or even superior to closed-source giants like GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 3 Opus.54DeepSeek-LLM & MoE Models: Alongside its coder models, the company released its first general-purpose DeepSeek-LLM and experimental DeepSeek-MoE models in late 2023 and early 2024.21 These served as the foundational workhorses and testbeds for the architectural innovations that would define their later, more powerful successors.
4.2 The Leap Forward: DeepSeek-V2 and V3 (2024)
The V-series represents the maturation of DeepSeek's core architectural innovations, combining MoE with MLA to create exceptionally powerful and efficient models.
DeepSeek-V2: Released in May 2024, DeepSeek-V2 was the first flagship model to fully integrate the company's key technologies of Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) and DeepSeekMoE.36 With 236 billion total parameters but only 21 billion active per token, it showcased a dramatic improvement in efficiency over previous models. DeepSeek also released
DeepSeek-V2-Lite, a smaller 16B parameter version, to facilitate research and experimentation by the community.41DeepSeek-V3: In late 2024, the company unveiled DeepSeek-V3, its 671 billion parameter MoE behemoth, which activates 37 billion parameters per token.26 This model family is split into two primary variants:
DeepSeek-V3-Base: The raw, pre-trained foundational model.
DeepSeek-V3-Chat: The instruction-tuned and reinforcement-learning-aligned version designed for conversational use. This is the model identified as deepseek-chat in the company's API.5
DeepSeek-V2.5: An interim release, DeepSeek-V2.5, served as a bridge, integrating the general conversational abilities of DeepSeek-V2-Chat with the strong coding capabilities of DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct.57
4.3 The Crown Jewel: The R-Series Reasoning Models (2025)
The R-series marks DeepSeek's push into the highest echelons of AI capability, focusing explicitly on complex reasoning, logic, mathematics, and coding.
DeepSeek-R1: Released in January 2025, DeepSeek-R1 is a specialized reasoning model built upon the DeepSeek-V3-Base foundation but trained using the company's novel reinforcement learning pipeline.26 Identified as
deepseek-reasoner in the API, its defining characteristic is its ability to generate explicit, step-by-step chain-of-thought processes to solve problems, making its reasoning transparent and auditable.5Key Updates (R1-0528): A major update released in May 2025, DeepSeek-R1-0528, delivered significant performance gains. It dramatically improved reasoning accuracy on advanced math and coding benchmarks, substantially reduced hallucination rates, and achieved performance that approached top-tier proprietary models like OpenAI's o3.35
Distilled R1 Models: To make its advanced reasoning capabilities more accessible, DeepSeek released a suite of smaller models distilled from R1's knowledge. These models, based on open-source foundations like Llama and Qwen and ranging from 1.5B to 70B parameters, offer potent reasoning skills at a much lower computational cost.35
The following table provides a consolidated overview of DeepSeek's major model releases.
Table 1: DeepSeek Model Lineage and Key Specifications
Section 5: Performance Under the Microscope: A Multi-faceted Benchmark and Real-World Analysis
Evaluating the true capability of a large language model requires a multi-faceted approach, combining quantitative analysis from standardized benchmarks with qualitative feedback from real-world users. This section provides such an analysis for DeepSeek's models, comparing them against their primary competitors from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta. The findings reveal a strategic pattern of targeted excellence: while DeepSeek's generalist models are highly competitive, its specialized models for coding and reasoning often achieve state-of-the-art performance, a testament to the company's focused R&D efforts.
5.1 Quantitative Showdown: Benchmarking Against the Giants
Standardized benchmarks provide an objective, though imperfect, measure of a model's capabilities across various domains. The data shows that DeepSeek's models are not just competitive but are often leaders in their areas of specialization.
General Knowledge & Reasoning: On broad benchmarks like MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding), which tests knowledge across 57 subjects, DeepSeek-V3 performs on par with GPT-4o and Llama 3.1, with all three scoring around 88.5%.63 However, on more complex reasoning-focused benchmarks like MMLU-Pro and GPQA (which features PhD-level questions), the specialized
DeepSeek-R1 model pulls ahead of its generalist counterparts and demonstrates performance approaching that of OpenAI's top reasoning models.47Math & Coding: This is where DeepSeek's specialized models truly shine. While Llama 3.1 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet show strong performance on the MATH benchmark, and GPT-4o leads on the HumanEval code generation test, DeepSeek's dedicated models often surpass them.63 The
DeepSeek Coder V2 and DeepSeek-R1-0528 models consistently rank at or near the top of leaderboards for coding (LiveCodeBench) and advanced mathematics competitions (AIME), demonstrating state-of-the-art capabilities in these high-value, verifiable domains.47 This focused excellence appears to be a deliberate strategy. By dominating the most technically demanding and easily verifiable benchmarks, DeepSeek builds immense credibility with the developer community—the very people who build applications and drive platform adoption. This approach of winning the "hearts and minds" of the builders, who may then pull the rest of the ecosystem onto their platform, is a classic disruptive strategy, even if the models' general chat capabilities are not definitively number one.
The following tables summarize the comparative performance on key benchmarks.
Table 2: Comparative Performance on General & Reasoning Benchmarks
Table 3: Comparative Performance on Technical Benchmarks (Math & Coding)
5.2 The Cost-Performance Equation: Unbeatable Efficiency
Perhaps the most disruptive aspect of DeepSeek's market entry is its aggressive pricing, which is a direct result of its architectural efficiencies. The company's API services are dramatically cheaper than those of its Western competitors. Analysis shows that using GPT-4o can be approximately 30 times more expensive than using DeepSeek-V3 for a comparable number of input and output tokens.63 Even DeepSeek's more powerful
R1 reasoning model, while priced higher than its chat counterpart, remains a fraction of the cost of similarly capable models from OpenAI or Anthropic.61 This combination of competitive-to-superior performance at a radically lower price point is the primary driver of its explosive popularity and its profound impact on the market.
5.3 From the Trenches: Developer and User Community Feedback
Qualitative feedback from developer and user communities on platforms like Reddit and Hacker News provides a crucial real-world counterpoint to benchmark scores. This feedback paints a picture of a powerful but sometimes quirky set of tools.
Positive Feedback: A recurring theme is DeepSeek's exceptional performance on coding and technical problem-solving. Numerous developers report that the models, particularly R1, have solved complex programming issues that had stumped other leading AIs like ChatGPT.66 The explicit "chain-of-thought" reasoning displayed by
R1 is often praised as both fascinating for its transparency and a sign of the model's honesty about its process.68 In more creative domains, users have lauded the models for their strong memory, creativity, and nuanced storytelling in role-playing scenarios.70Negative Feedback & Quirks: The user experience is not without its flaws. The R1 model is sometimes described as "unhinged" or overly aggressive in its creativity, while the V3 chat model can feel "bland" or "sensible" in comparison.70 Users have encountered issues such as the models generating very short or even empty responses, incorrectly replying as the user, and exhibiting stubbornness or hallucinating facts on subjects outside their training data.70 Some developers have found the models struggle with complex code debugging or lack knowledge in niche domains.67
This contradictory feedback highlights the subjective nature of AI interaction and the critical importance of prompt engineering. A model that one user finds "chaotic" another might find "creative," underscoring that the perceived performance can depend heavily on the user's task, expectations, and interaction style.
Section 6: The Double-Edged Sword: A Critical Assessment of Security, Privacy, and Ethical Risks
For all its technological brilliance, DeepSeek is plagued by a history of severe and systemic failures in security, privacy, and ethics. The disconnect between its sophisticated model architecture and its primitive, insecure implementation practices is alarming. This suggests a corporate culture that has prioritized rapid performance gains and deployment over the foundational principles of security and user trust. For any organization considering its use, DeepSeek presents a uniquely dangerous proposition: a brilliant engine in a car with no brakes. The decision to adopt its technology is not a simple cost-performance trade-off but a complex risk management calculation.
6.1 Security Posture: A "Canary in the Coal Mine"
DeepSeek's security track record is marred by incidents that reveal fundamental weaknesses. These are not sophisticated, novel attacks but failures of basic cybersecurity hygiene.
Documented Incidents: In January 2025, the company was forced to temporarily halt new user registrations due to a "malicious" cyberattack, signaling a vulnerable infrastructure.13 More alarmingly, security researchers discovered a publicly accessible, unsecured ClickHouse database. This misconfiguration exposed over a million sensitive records, including user chat histories, backend operational details, API secrets, and even plaintext passwords, to anyone on the internet.13
Application Vulnerabilities: Independent security audits of DeepSeek's iOS and Android applications have uncovered a litany of egregious security flaws. These include the global disabling of App Transport Security (ATS), a platform-level protection in iOS, which allows the app to send sensitive user and device data over the internet without encryption.12 The app was also found to use a weak and deprecated encryption algorithm (3DES) with a hard-coded key, meaning the key needed to decrypt data could be extracted directly from the app itself.14 Further analysis revealed potential for SQL injection attacks and, troublingly, the use of anti-debugging mechanisms designed to obstruct security analysis—an unusual practice for a company claiming transparency.12
Model Vulnerabilities (Jailbreaking): Beyond infrastructure, the models themselves have proven insecure. Studies by firms like Cisco and Qualys TotalAI found that DeepSeek's models are highly susceptible to "jailbreaking," where crafted prompts bypass safety filters. One assessment found the model failed to block a single harmful prompt related to cybercrime and misinformation, compared to block rates of 86% for GPT-4o and 64% for Gemini.6 Researchers have demonstrated the models can be easily manipulated to generate instructions for illicit activities like money laundering and malware creation, suggesting a critical neglect of safety updates that competitors implemented years prior.13
6.2 Data Privacy: A "Trojan Horse" for Data Harvesting?
DeepSeek's approach to data privacy has drawn intense scrutiny from regulators and security experts, who raise concerns that the platform may function as a massive data collection tool for entities in China.
Aggressive Data Collection and Storage in China: The company's privacy policy is explicit about its extensive data collection practices. It gathers account information, all user inputs and outputs (prompts and chat history), device and network data, IP addresses, approximate location data, and even highly sensitive behavioral biometrics like "keystroke patterns or rhythms".78 Critically, the policy states that this data is stored on servers located in the People's Republic of China.13
Government Access and State-Owned Connections: Storing data in the PRC places it under the jurisdiction of Chinese national security laws, which can compel companies to share user data with state intelligence and security agencies upon request, without the legal due process required in Western countries.6 This risk is compounded by documented technical links between DeepSeek's platform and Chinese state-owned entities. Researchers found that the user login page contains code that connects to China Mobile, a state-owned telecommunications giant that has been banned from operating in the U.S. due to its ties to the Chinese military and national security risks.6 These factors have led governments in Italy, Taiwan, Australia, South Korea, and agencies within the U.S. to ban or restrict the use of DeepSeek on government devices.6
6.3 Ethical and Legal Quagmire
The controversies surrounding DeepSeek extend into fundamental ethical and legal territory, challenging the very foundation of its innovative claims and its standing in the global AI community.
Allegations of Intellectual Property Theft: The narrative of DeepSeek as a purely independent innovator has been directly challenged by serious allegations of intellectual property theft. A report from the U.S. House Select Committee on the CCP, following meetings with U.S. industry leaders, concluded it is "highly likely" that DeepSeek used unlawful "model distillation" to create its models.15 This practice involves systematically querying proprietary U.S. models (like those from OpenAI) to extract and replicate their reasoning capabilities, in direct violation of their terms of service.49 The committee alleged that DeepSeek personnel used aliases and sophisticated international banking channels to fraudulently acquire accounts for this purpose.15 These accusations suggest that DeepSeek's performance may have been boosted by illicitly "stealing" the R&D of its competitors.
Censorship and Propaganda: Users and researchers have reported that the DeepSeek chatbot systematically censors or refuses to answer questions on topics politically sensitive to the Chinese Communist Party, such as the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, human rights abuses against Uyghurs, and the political status of Taiwan.13 This behavior indicates that the model's outputs are filtered to align with CCP propaganda, raising significant concerns about its potential use as a tool for global information manipulation.
Liability and Lack of User Protection: DeepSeek's terms of service place the full burden of risk and liability squarely on the user. The company broadly disclaims any liability and, unlike some of its Western competitors who offer limited indemnification for paid users against intellectual property infringement claims, DeepSeek provides no such protection. Instead, the user agrees to indemnify and defend DeepSeek against any and all claims, leaving enterprise users and developers dangerously exposed.84
The following table summarizes the documented risks associated with the DeepSeek platform.
Table 4: Summary of Documented Security and Privacy Risks
Section 7: Strategic Analysis and Future Outlook
DeepSeek's emergence is more than a story of a single company; it is a catalyst reshaping the strategic landscape of the entire AI industry. Its technological achievements and controversial practices are forcing a fundamental re-evaluation of the economics of AI, the path to AGI, and the very definition of competitive advantage. The most significant long-term impact may be the bifurcation of the AI industry into two distinct camps: high-trust, high-cost, vertically integrated providers, and low-cost, high-performance, "untrusted" component providers.
7.1 The New Economics of AI: A Race to the Bottom or a Shift in Value?
DeepSeek's radical cost efficiency has irrevocably altered the economics of artificial intelligence. By demonstrating that state-of-the-art performance can be achieved for a fraction of the previously assumed cost, the company has triggered a price war among major AI vendors and forced the industry to reconsider the "cost of intelligence".1 This has several long-term implications.
First, it will become increasingly difficult for AI companies to justify premium pricing based on performance alone. As algorithmic innovations proliferate and the cost of training continues to fall, foundational model capabilities may become commoditized.17 This will shift the locus of value creation away from the base models themselves and toward the applications, user experiences, and specialized solutions built on top of them. The competitive "moat" will no longer be the model's raw intelligence, but rather its integration into a trusted, secure, and valuable product ecosystem. DeepSeek's success forces its competitors to double down on their true value proposition, which is increasingly becoming "trust" rather than just "performance."
7.2 The AGI Roadmap: Plausible Vision or Unrealistic Dream?
Liang Wenfeng's vision of achieving AGI in our lifetime drives DeepSeek's research agenda.22 The company's methodology, while ambitious, is grounded in a pragmatic research strategy. Its focus on verifiable domains like mathematics and coding provides a rigorous sandbox for testing and improving reasoning capabilities.27 Furthermore, its pioneering work in using pure reinforcement learning to elicit emergent reasoning in the
R1-Zero model represents a significant scientific contribution, validating that complex cognitive abilities can be developed without massive, human-labeled supervised datasets.45 This is a key pillar in their exploration of AGI.
However, the roadmap is not without its challenges. The approach still relies on scaling laws and massive data, which may face diminishing returns or lead to model collapse. More importantly, the company's apparent disregard for the ethical and safety dimensions of AI development represents a critical blind spot. A true AGI cannot be achieved through technical prowess alone; it requires a deep and integrated understanding of alignment, safety, and human values—areas where DeepSeek currently appears to be lagging.
7.3 Recommendations for Key Stakeholders
The dual nature of DeepSeek—powerful yet perilous—necessitates different strategies for different actors in the AI ecosystem.
For Developers: The low-cost, high-performance APIs offered by DeepSeek, particularly for its specialized reasoning and coding models, present an unparalleled opportunity for experimentation, prototyping, and building innovative applications.58 Developers can leverage state-of-the-art capabilities that were previously accessible only through expensive, proprietary platforms. However, this comes with a significant caveat: they must be acutely aware of the platform's security risks and the lack of user indemnification in the terms of service. The platform should be treated as a powerful but fundamentally untrusted component, with appropriate security and legal safeguards built around it.
For Enterprise Adopters: The risk calculus for enterprises is far more stringent. Using DeepSeek's public API with any sensitive, confidential, or proprietary data is an unacceptably high-risk proposition, given the documented security breaches, weak data protection, and data residency in China. For enterprises, the only viable path to leveraging DeepSeek's technology is to self-host the open-weight models within a secure, isolated, and tightly controlled environment. This approach allows the organization to maintain full control over data residency, network access, and security posture, mitigating the most severe risks of the public platform.13 A thorough vendor risk assessment and continuous security monitoring are non-negotiable prerequisites.
For Investors and Competitors: DeepSeek has definitively proven that algorithmic and architectural efficiency can be a more potent competitive moat than sheer capital. Competitors can no longer rely on outspending the market as a sustainable strategy. They must now focus on justifying their higher cost structures by delivering superior performance combined with demonstrable advantages in security, privacy, reliability, and trust. For investors, DeepSeek's success should prompt skepticism toward claims that massive, multi-billion dollar funding rounds are the only path to building state-of-the-art AI. The new benchmark for a sound investment is not just the size of the model, but the intelligence of its design.
This market segmentation is creating a new strategic landscape. One segment of users will be willing to pay a premium for a "trusted," secure, all-in-one solution from an established provider. Another segment, particularly developers and agile startups, will be willing to accept the risks of an "untrusted" but high-performance component in exchange for radical cost savings, planning to build their own trust and security layers around it. This forces the entire industry to compete not just on performance, but on the explicit currency of trust.
Section 8: Conclusion: A Paradigm Shift with a Heavy Price
DeepSeek has cemented its place in the history of artificial intelligence as a force of profound disruption. Its legacy is twofold: it has irrevocably altered the technological and economic trajectory of the industry, while simultaneously serving as a stark cautionary tale about the perils of innovation untethered from responsibility. The company embodies the central paradox of the current AI era, forcing the global community to confront difficult questions about the intricate relationship between performance, cost, security, and geopolitical trust.
8.1 A Legacy of Disruption
DeepSeek's contributions to the advancement of AI are undeniable. It has shattered the long-held belief that building frontier models is the exclusive domain of capital-rich Western tech giants. By pioneering a suite of efficiency-focused innovations—from Mixture-of-Experts and Multi-head Latent Attention to novel reinforcement learning pipelines—the company has proven that clever engineering and algorithmic ingenuity can outpace brute-force scaling.19 In doing so, it has democratized access to state-of-the-art AI capabilities through its commitment to open-weight models and radically low-cost APIs, accelerating the entire field's focus on efficiency and accessibility.
8.2 The Unpaid Debt of Trust
This remarkable technological progress, however, has been built on a fragile foundation. DeepSeek has accrued a significant and thus far "unpaid debt" of trust. The company's track record is defined by a pattern of severe security lapses, invasive data privacy practices, and unresolved ethical and legal controversies.6 While DeepSeek has demonstrated an extraordinary ability to solve complex technical problems related to model performance, it has largely failed to solve—or in many cases, even seriously address—the equally difficult problems of building a secure, transparent, and trustworthy platform. Its rapid deployment has consistently outpaced the implementation of essential safety and security guardrails, leaving its users and the broader ecosystem exposed to significant risk.
8.3 Final Verdict
Ultimately, DeepSeek stands as a monumental and essential case study in the complexities of 21st-century technological development. It has provided the world with a powerful new set of tools and a new paradigm for efficient AI innovation. Yet this progress comes at a heavy price. The "DeepSeek effect" is a powerful reminder that in the quest for artificial intelligence, raw computational power is not the only measure of strength. For developers, enterprises, and nations navigating the future of this transformative technology, the critical lesson is that the smartest model is not always the wisest choice. True, sustainable progress will require a balanced pursuit of not only performance and efficiency, but also the foundational, non-negotiable principles of security, privacy, and trust.
Works cited
DeepSeek: What You Need to Know - CSAIL Alliances - MIT, accessed July 19, 2025, https://cap.csail.mit.edu/research/deepseek-what-you-need-know
Q&A: DeepSeek AI assistant and the future of AI | Penn State University, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/qa-deepseek-ai-assistant-and-future-ai
Liang Wenfeng: All About The Brain Behind DeepSeek - NDTV, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.ndtv.com/feature/liang-wenfeng-all-about-the-brain-behind-deepseek-7577547
What is DeepSeek? Here's a quick guide to the Chinese AI company ..., accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/what-is-deepseek-heres-a-quick-guide-to-the-chinese-ai-company
Deepseek Business Model: How Does Deepseek Make Money?, accessed July 19, 2025, https://businessmodelanalyst.com/deepseek-business-model/
Delving into the Dangers of DeepSeek - CSIS, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/delving-dangers-deepseek
DeepSeek: How a small Chinese AI company is shaking up US tech heavyweights - The University of Sydney, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/01/29/deepseek-ai-china-us-tech.html
How Disruptive Is DeepSeek? Stanford HAI Faculty Discuss China's New Model, accessed July 19, 2025, https://hai.stanford.edu/news/how-disruptive-deepseek-stanford-hai-faculty-discuss-chinas-new-model
How China's New AI Model DeepSeek Is Threatening U.S. Dominance - YouTube, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEBiebbeNCA
DeepSeek: A Case Study on "Necessity is the Mother of Invention" in the AI World, accessed July 19, 2025, https://techstrong.ai/articles/deepseek-a-case-study-on-necessity-is-the-mother-of-invention-in-the-ai-world/
What Is DeepSeek and How It's Revolutionizing the AI Industry? - Owebest Technologies, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.owebest.com/blog/what-is-deep-seek
DeepSeek App Transmits Sensitive User and Device Data Without Encryption, accessed July 19, 2025, https://thehackernews.com/2025/02/deepseek-app-transmits-sensitive-user.html
DeepSeek Security, Privacy, and Governance: Hidden Risks in Open-Source AI - Theori, accessed July 19, 2025, https://theori.io/blog/deepseek-security-privacy-and-governance-hidden-risks-in-open-source-ai
Experts Flag Security, Privacy Risks in DeepSeek AI App, accessed July 19, 2025, https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/02/experts-flag-security-privacy-risks-in-deepseek-ai-app/
DeepSeek report - Select Committee on the CCP |, accessed July 19, 2025, https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/DeepSeek%20Final.pdf
Attorney General Ken Paxton Announces Investigation into DeepSeek and Notifies the Chinese AI Company of its Violation of Texas State Law, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-announces-investigation-deepseek-and-notifies-chinese-ai-company-its
DeepSeek's release of an open-weight frontier AI model, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic-comments/2025/04/deepseeks-release-of-an-open-weight-frontier-ai-model/
DeepSeek's Long-Term Effect - Hacker News, accessed July 19, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42960396
www.invesco.com, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.invesco.com/us/en/insights/ai-after-deepseek.html#:~:text=2023%20and%202024%20focused%20on,quality%20for%20future%20AI%20adoption.
DeepSeek's Impact on the Future of AI | Pure Storage Blog, accessed July 19, 2025, https://blog.purestorage.com/perspectives/deepseeks-impact-on-the-future-of-ai/
DeepSeek - Wikipedia, accessed July 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepSeek
Liang Wenfeng - Peter Fisk, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.peterfisk.com/leader/liang-wenfeng/
DeepSeek AI: Company Overview, Founding team, Culture and DeepSeek R1 Model | by ByteBridge, accessed July 19, 2025, https://bytebridge.medium.com/deepseek-ai-company-overview-founding-team-culture-and-deepseek-r1-model-ea87f711b4b3
Inside DeepSeek — An Interview with Founder Liang Wenfeng on AI Disruption and AGI, accessed July 19, 2025, https://medium.com/@bingqian/inside-deepseek-an-interview-with-founder-liang-wenfeng-on-ai-disruption-and-agi-4c5db26091c2
These 60 thoughts reveal the uniqueness of Liang Wenfeng, the founder of DeepSeek., accessed July 19, 2025, https://news.futunn.com/en/post/52885345/these-60-thoughts-reveal-the-uniqueness-of-liang-wenfeng-the
What is DeepSeek? — everything to know - Tom's Guide, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/what-is-deepseek-everything-to-know
DeepSeek: Shaping the Future of Artificial General Intelligence | by Rajesh Gauswami, accessed July 19, 2025, https://medium.com/@mr.gauswami/deepseek-shaping-the-future-of-artificial-general-intelligence-a94e0f5e01dc
The Censorship Dilemma Behind DeepSeek's AGI Mission - Analytics India Magazine, accessed July 19, 2025, https://analyticsindiamag.com/global-tech/the-censorship-dilemma-behind-deepseeks-agi-mission/
Why DeepSeek had to be open source | Hacker News, accessed July 19, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42866201
Liang Wenfeng's Bold AI Vision: Open, Smart, Original - AGI, accessed July 19, 2025, https://agi.co.uk/liang-wenfeng-ai-philosophy/
The DeepSeek Effect: Rewriting AI Economics Through Algorithmic ..., accessed July 19, 2025, https://medium.com/@aiml_58187/the-deepseek-effect-rewriting-ai-economics-through-algorithmic-efficiency-part-1-46cf9b2e9930
Deepseek 4 Official Papers Overview: Deepseek MoE, MLA, MTP, Distillation - Medium, accessed July 19, 2025, https://medium.com/@joycebirkins/deepseek-4-official-papers-overview-deepseek-moe-mla-mtp-distillation-49a97b3b90a8
What Is Mixture of Experts MoE in Machine Vision Systems - UnitX, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.unitxlabs.com/resources/mixture-of-experts-moe-machine-vision-system-explained/
Mixture of Experts Hands on Demonstration | Visual Explanation - YouTube, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yw6fpYPJ7PI
The Complete Guide to DeepSeek Models: From V3 to R1 and Beyond, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.bentoml.com/blog/the-complete-guide-to-deepseek-models-from-v3-to-r1-and-beyond
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2 - Hugging Face, accessed July 19, 2025, https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2
The Emergence of DeepSeek-R1 and What We Must Not Overlook – Part 1 - Allganize's AI, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.allganize.ai/en/blog/the-emergence-of-deepseek-r1-and-what-we-must-not-overlook---part-1
DeepSeek's Elaborate Research, Shocking Inspiration | by issong - Medium, accessed July 19, 2025, https://medium.com/@insungsong5/deepseek-inspires-my-mixture-of-experts-research-16b15f2fd25b
The Inner Workings of Multihead Latent Attention (MLA) - Chris McCormick, accessed July 19, 2025, https://mccormickml.com/2025/04/26/inner-workings-of-mla/
Understanding Multi-Head Latent Attention | by Erik Taylor | Digital Mind | Medium, accessed July 19, 2025, https://medium.com/digital-mind/understanding-multi-head-latent-attention-36f5d954f0cf
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2-Lite - Hugging Face, accessed July 19, 2025, https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2-Lite
DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of ..., accessed July 19, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04434
Understanding Multi-Head Latent Attention, accessed July 19, 2025, https://planetbanatt.net/articles/mla.html
A Gentle Introduction to Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA) - MachineLearningMastery.com, accessed July 19, 2025, https://machinelearningmastery.com/a-gentle-introduction-to-multi-head-latent-attention-mla/
DeepSeek-R1 Paper Explained – A New RL LLMs Era in AI? - AI Papers Academy, accessed July 19, 2025, https://aipapersacademy.com/deepseek-r1/
DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning - arXiv, accessed July 19, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.12948
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1 · Hugging Face, accessed July 19, 2025, https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1
(PDF) Technical Report: Analyzing DeepSeek-R1's Impact on AI Development, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388484582_Technical_Report_Analyzing_DeepSeek-R1's_Impact_on_AI_Development
How Distillation Makes AI Models Smaller and Cheaper | Quanta Magazine, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-distillation-makes-ai-models-smaller-and-cheaper-20250718/
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder: DeepSeek Coder: Let the Code Write Itself - GitHub, accessed July 19, 2025, https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder
deepseek-coder - Ollama, accessed July 19, 2025, https://ollama.com/library/deepseek-coder
DeepSeek Coder, accessed July 19, 2025, https://deepseekcoder.github.io/
DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets ..., accessed July 19, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.14196
DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence - GitHub, accessed July 19, 2025, https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct - Hugging Face, accessed July 19, 2025, https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct
deepseek-v2 - Ollama, accessed July 19, 2025, https://ollama.com/library/deepseek-v2
DeepSeek-V2.5 - ModelScope, accessed July 19, 2025, https://modelscope.cn/models/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek API: A Guide With Examples and Cost Calculations ..., accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/deepseek-api
DeepSeek's New R1–0528: Performance Analysis and Benchmark Comparisons - Medium, accessed July 19, 2025, https://medium.com/@leucopsis/deepseeks-new-r1-0528-performance-analysis-and-benchmark-comparisons-6440eac858d6
Change Log - DeepSeek API Docs, accessed July 19, 2025, https://api-docs.deepseek.com/updates
New Deepseek R1-0528 Update is INSANE - Analytics Vidhya, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2025/05/deepseek-r1-0528/
DeepSeek-R1 Release, accessed July 19, 2025, https://api-docs.deepseek.com/news/news250120
DeepSeek-V3 vs GPT-4o vs Llama 3.3 70B: Find the Best AI Model, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2025/01/deepseek-v3-vs-gpt-4o-vs-llama-3-3-70b/
DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) - Intelligence, Performance & Price ..., accessed July 19, 2025, https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-r1
Mistral 7B vs DeepSeek R1 (2025) | Performance, Pricing, and Practical Use Cases | Which LLM Delivers Superior Performance?, accessed July 19, 2025, https://elephas.app/blog/deepseek-vs-mistral
Deepseek is incredible - Reddit, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/DeepSeek/comments/1ice3cj/deepseek_is_incredible/
ChatGPT is better than DeepSeek, why are people pretending otherwise? - Reddit, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1icsgr7/chatgpt_is_better_than_deepseek_why_are_people/
DeepSeek Megathread : r/ArtificialInteligence - Reddit, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1ibzsfd/deepseek_megathread/
DeepSeek-R1 - Hacker News, accessed July 19, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42768072
My honest review of deepseek after a month of use : r/JanitorAI_Official - Reddit, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/JanitorAI_Official/comments/1jhgd94/my_honest_review_of_deepseek_after_a_month_of_use/
DeepSeek mini review : r/SillyTavernAI - Reddit, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SillyTavernAI/comments/1ia2dmq/deepseek_mini_review/
I Broke DeepSeek AI : r/ChatGPT - Reddit, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1id0c9j/i_broke_deepseek_ai/
Has DeepSeek or any other AI Surprised You Yet? - Reddit, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/DeepSeek/comments/1jmpovf/has_deepseek_or_any_other_ai_surprised_you_yet/
Lessons Learned from the DeepSeek Cyber Attack - Obsidian Security, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.obsidiansecurity.com/blog/lessons-learned-from-the-deepseek-cyber-attack
DeepSeek Data Breach Of One Million Records Exposes AI Security Vulnerabilities, accessed July 19, 2025, https://sentrybay.com/deepseek-data-breach-of-one-million-records-exposes-ai-security-vulnerabilities/
The DeepSeek controversy: Authorities ask where does the data come from and how safe is it? | Malwarebytes, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2025/01/the-deepseek-controversy-authorities-ask-where-the-data-comes-from-and-where-it-goes
AI Privacy Risks: Is DeepSeek Safe for Your Business Data? - Vendict, accessed July 19, 2025, https://vendict.com/blog/ai-privacy-risks-is-deepseek-safe-for-your-business-data
A Deep Peek at DeepSeek - SecurityScorecard, accessed July 19, 2025, https://securityscorecard.com/blog/a-deep-peek-at-deepseek/
Security Researchers Warn of New Risks in DeepSeek AI App - BankInfoSecurity, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/security-researchers-warn-new-risks-in-deepseek-ai-app-a-27486
DeepSeek breach yet again sheds light on AI dangers - SC Media, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.scworld.com/perspective/deepseek-breach-yet-again-sheds-light-on-ai-dangers
Think Twice Before Using DeepSeek: Security and Trust Issues Explained – AI at Carleton, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.carleton.edu/ai/blog/think-twice-before-using-deepseek-security-and-trust-issues-explained/
DeepSeek Privacy Policy, accessed July 19, 2025, https://cdn.deepseek.com/policies/en-US/deepseek-privacy-policy.html
Is DeepSeek AI Secure? Key Privacy & Security Risks Explained, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.index.dev/blog/deepseek-ai-security-privacy-risks
DeepSeek: Legal Considerations for Enterprise Users | Insights | Ropes & Gray LLP, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2025/01/deepseek-legal-considerations-for-enterprise-users
DeepSeek app security and privacy weaknesses | Information Systems & Technology | University of Waterloo, accessed July 19, 2025, https://uwaterloo.ca/information-systems-technology/news/deepseek-app-security-and-privacy-weaknesses
Ethical Considerations in the Deployment of DeepSeek AI in Fintech, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.fintechweekly.com/magazine/articles/deepseek-in-fintech-ethical-considerations
Build Full Stack DeepSeek Clone Using Next JS With DeepSeek API | AI Project In Next Js, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJPa_18Zf1I
Seeking Deep: Building with DeepSeek APIs | by Siva Ramaswami | Medium, accessed July 19, 2025, https://medium.com/@sramaswami11/seeking-deep-building-with-deepseek-apis-4207bdf17b86